Showing posts with label Fish. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fish. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

Vietnam - PM orders probe into industrial fish sauce

Prime Minister Nguyễn Xuân Phúc has tasked the Ministry of Health to quickly clarify the contents of an article published by Thanh Niên (Young People) newspaper about “industrial” fish sauces containing a number of chemical additives being sold in the market. — Photo zing.vn

Prime Minister Nguyễn Xuân Phúc has tasked the Ministry of Health to quickly clarify the contents of an article published by Thanh Niên (Young People) newspaper about “industrial” fish sauces containing a number of chemical additives being sold in the market.


The Prime Minister’s requirement was issued a few hours after the newspaper published an article titled “Water + chemicals = industrial fish sauce” on Monday morning.

In Việt Nam, traditional fish sauce is made from two ingredients - fish and salt, thus it has high concentrations of protein and salinity. In the meantime, "industrial fish sauce" has much lower concentration of protein and salinity, and contains dozens of chemical additives.

Phúc asked the health ministry to co-operate with the Ministry of Industry and Trade to conduct inspections and submit a report to him before October 22.

According to Thanh Niên (Young People) newspaper, up to 17 chemical additives, including flavour enhancers, colouring agents, and preservatives were found in one of the most popular industrial fish sauces on the market. Additionally, the popular fish sauce did not provide information on exactly how much of its sauce was made from fish.

Thanh Niên newspaper also quoted Trần Văn Ký, a doctor from the Việt Nam Food Safety Association (VINAFOSA), who said that although the chemical additives used in industrial fish sauces were permitted by authorised agencies, consumers’ health might still be affected if they consume it on a daily basis.

In another development, participants at a workshop, themed “ Fish sauce – Conserving and developing traditional fish sauce” held on Monday in HCM City said there should be a regulation to standardise nutritional information given on each bottle of fish sauce so that consumers could easily distinguish between traditional and "industrial fish sauce".

At present, each producer provided nutritional information under their own guidelines, potentially confusing "industrial fish sauce" with traditional fish sauce, the participants said.

The confusion would affect the competitiveness of traditional fish sauce producers, Ngô Quang Tú, head of Processing and Preserving Seafood Office under the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Department said.

This was because the traditional fish sauce, with higher concentration of protein and salinity, often was sold at higher prices than "industrial fish sauce", he said.

Additionally, traditional fish sauce producers nationwide also faced difficulties in competing with industrial fish sauce producers due to a lack of anchovy supply – the main material in traditional fish sauce, said Nguyễn Thị Tịnh, former head of Phú Quốc Fish Sauce Association.

Therefore, traditional fish sauce producers suffer increasing production costs, pushing the selling price higher than that of industrial fish sauce, she said.

It costs about about VNĐ43,000 ($2) per litre of "industrial fish sauce" and about VNĐ160,000-200,000 ($7-9) per litre of traditional fish sauce, depending on the concentration of protein.

Statistics from the General Statistics Office showed the country consumes about 200 million litres of fish sauce each year.

According to Euromonitor data, Việt Nam’s fish sauce market was worth VNĐ11.3 trillion (US$506 million) in 2015, of which "industrial fish sauce" accounted for 76 per cent.



You can find older posts regarding ASEAN politics and economics news at SBC blog, and older posts regarding health and healthcare at IIMS blog. I thank you.

Tuesday, October 4, 2016

Cambodia - A New Weapon to Fight Mosquito-Borne Diseases: Tiny Fish

Scientists hope the simple solution can help slow the spread of dengue, malaria, Zika, and other illnesses.

Kampong Cham, Cambodia—In a backyard lush with mango and papaya trees, an addition to Touch Sophea’s family was stirring excitement: Several tadpole-size guppies were doing laps in a large barrel of water.

“They’re pretty to look at, with so many colors,” said the farmer. The 33-year-old gathered around the container with her three children, her husband, and her niece at their home in Kampong Cham province, about 80 miles from Cambodia’s capital, Phnom Penh.


Fish often have a spiritual significance in Asian cultures, and in Cambodia, they are seen as lucky. But these little swimmers, which at about half an inch long would be tough to spot if they weren’t so active, are not just pets, as Sophea’s children think of them.

They are part of a promising one-year trial testing a low-tech innovation against dengue and other diseases spread by mosquitoes.

The nonprofit Malaria Consortium is nearing the end of an experiment in Cambodia that pits a low-tech innovation against a modern problem:

As climate change has worsened, new regions are seeing more cases of dangerous illnesses spread by mosquitoes, such as dengue, which is responsible for an estimated 400 million infections annually, according to the World Health Organization.

Though deaths from dengue are on the decline, the illness racks the body with symptoms including a mild fever, headaches, rashes, and sore muscles and joints—devastating livelihoods. In deadly cases, dengue causes severe bleeding and organ impairment.

Infection numbers have risen, and in 2015 there were more than 3.2 million known dengue cases across the Americas, Southeast Asia, and Western Pacific, according to the World Health Organization.

About 70 percent of infections occur in Asia, according to the journal Nature.


Touch Sophea and her children gather around a barrel containing guppies. (Photo: Amy Fallon)

That high percentage is why scientists here are exploring simple solutions to some of medicine’s toughest problems—even as the search continues for cures to dengue and other mosquito-borne illnesses, such as Zika, malaria, and West Nile.

“There is an urgent need to find an effective low-cost and home-grown solution,” Jeffrey Hii, a senior vector-control specialist for Malaria Consortium, told TakePart.

What can a guppy do? The aim of the pilot, which is funded by the U.K. and German governments, is for the fish to eat the mosquito larvae that are typically laid in natural water sources—which are abundant in the tropics—before the insects grow into adults and spread the disease.

The guppies, which are indigenous to rice paddies and other of the region’s natural water sources, are kept in rain barrels that Cambodians have long relied on to hold water for cooking and cleaning. The barrels are situated near homes and attract the majority of mosquitoes that carry dengue nearer to humans.

In Kampong Cham, which has one of the highest dengue incidence rates in Cambodia, thousands of guppies have been given to about 3,000 households by Malaria Consortium Cambodia, the organization's local branch, which began its pilot last October. Each villager is given two guppies, doled out from a school kept at the local health center, to breed at home. If these swimmers die, villagers can get more, though guppies typically reproduce within a month.


Dr. Jeffrey Hii. (Photo: Vanney Keo for Malaria Consortium)

Scores of community health volunteers, trained by Malaria Consortium Cambodia, are responsible for distributing the guppies and informing residents about prevention, including mosquito nets.

Traditionally, the best ways to reduce dengue have included properly throwing out trash, using insecticide sprays, coils, vaporizers, window screens, and bed nets, and wearing long-sleeved clothes.

But chemical insecticides are costly and require funding, and there is resistance to them, among other concerns.

Recently, pesticide sprays targeting Zika mosquitos in South Carolina were blamed for a massive bee die-off.

While Malaria Consortium supports some use of pesticides in times of outbreak, finding natural alternatives is a priority.

Sophea learned about the trial when a volunteer visited her province, which is home to nearly 1 million people. The trial’s social mobilization and communication strategy involved a tuk-tuk, a motorized rickshaw, driving through villages handing out fliers and informing residents through songs with informative lyrics.

“This was an effective and culturally appropriate method to reinforce message using songs. The songs were liked the most,” Hii said.

For Sophea, adopting a couple of fish didn’t take much convincing.

“One of my neighbors had dengue,” said Sophea. “I’m very concerned about my children contracting it. If they get it, my baby can die in one week.”



With about three-quarters of those infected with dengue not showing signs, some health experts have labeled it a silent disease. In July, Cambodia’s government warned of a rise in dengue—it typically occurs in outbreaks every three to five years—with more than 1,000 additional cases in the country in about a year.

Officially there were more than 15,000 cases and 38 deaths in 2015 across the country of about 15 million people, but Malaria Consortium Cambodia says the real figures are much higher.

As she watched the barrel’s waters on an August day, peeping at the guppies darting back and forth, Sophea said she couldn’t wait to see them hatch even more hungry fish.

“Before there were many mosquitoes, during the day and night, but now there’s less, and the kids can play around the house,” she said. Sophea also knows to watch for early symptoms of dengue, because she was told by health volunteers to be alert to a high fever, headaches, vomiting, and rashes.

The pilot ends in November, after which the government could include it in its health policy. In November the consortium plans to prepare policy recommendations, which could include expansion to more provinces. With government approval, the nonprofit would continue the work.

One local government official is impressed with one facet. Dr. Hay Ra, Kampong Cham dengue supervisor, praised the guppy program for being inexpensive.

But, Ra said, “we don’t know yet if the community will accept the guppy fish forever, if they will keep them for a long time. If it’s successful, the program can be applied in the whole country.”

He said weather patterns had affected the spread of dengue in Cambodia.

“Climate change is a big problem,” said Ra. “The number of larvae can increase, and the mosquitoes can increase. If we don’t prevent dengue, many people will die. Prevention is very important.”

While the guppies are being used in the first-of-its-kind trial in Asia, scientists thousands of miles away on another continent have come up with a surprising possible protection against malaria.

Sleeping with a chicken next to one’s bed, or suspending a live chicken in a cage, could guard against the disease, researchers at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and Addis Ababa University in Ethiopia have discovered, according to a trial published in Malaria Journal in July.

The study was conducted in Ethiopian villages and found that Anopheles arabiensis, one of the main mosquito species spreading malaria in sub-Saharan Africa, according to the World Health Organization, was repelled by chicken odor. The mosquito accounts for nearly 90 percent of malaria cases. Although it’s early days, the research could pave the way for a chicken-scent repellent being introduced on the market.

“In terms of really low-tech innovations, keeping a chicken indoors shouldn’t be very expensive,” lead researcher Rickard Ignell, from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, told TakePart. “It’s a matter of persuading people to do it.”

Ignell said in several villages across Africa that his team worked in and visited, many households kept their livestock inside but usually in a separate room next door.


(Photo: Vanney Keo for Malaria Consortium)

He stressed it was still important that households use bed nets and sprays to decrease the presence of mosquitoes indoors.

“This could potentially be used all around the world where there’s malaria. Now we’ve only done it for one species of malaria mosquitoes. We still need to check if other mosquitoes will behave the same,” Ignell said.

Beyond using animals to police mosquito populations, the plant world may offer another solution to decreasing malaria transmission, researchers in West Africa have found.

The Anopheles mosquito’s fondness for natural sources of plant sugar, such as nectar, fruits, and tree sap, can be used to reduce its ability to transmit malaria via certain plants, researchers in Burkina Faso found.

Their study, published in the PLOS Pathogens medical journal in August, showed that a mosquito’s ability to transmit malaria decreased if it fed from the plant Thevetia neriifolia, known as yellow oleander. Other plants increased the insect’s ability to transmit illness.

“What we are really aiming for now is testing a wider range of plant species, trying to find one or two that are attractive to mosquito vectors, that completely stop transmission,” researcher Thierry Lefèvre told TakePart. “Then what we imagine is to foster the planting of such species.”

Some existing malaria control methods, such as bed nets and indoor spraying, have faced resistance, so both low- and high-cost solutions were needed, said Ignell.

“To introduce new control methods, especially low-tech technologies, it is important that researchers working with mosquitoes work closely with social scientists, who have better tools and are more skilled to interact with villagers in the affected communities,” he said.

In Asia, Malaria Consortium hopes the current focus on Zika can be used to improve dengue control.

“We hope that the global attention can draw more attention to the urgent need to control one of the fastest-growing infectious diseases in the world that has been largely overlooked by the international community, a potentially fatal disease infecting millions per year,” Hii said.

Amy Fallon



You can find older posts regarding ASEAN politics and economics news at SBC blog, and older posts regarding health and healthcare at IIMS blog. I thank you.

Vietnam - Vietnam province to issue toxic seafood list amid post-disaster health scare

Fish caught by fishermen in a port in Ha Tinh Province. Photo by VnExpress/Tuan Son

It's taken authorities five months to let people know what is and what is not safe to eat.

Authorities in the central province of Ha Tinh will distribute a list of 154 types of seafood caught from the seabed within 13.5 nautical miles of the central coast that health officials are warning locals to avoid.

The list will be posted at fishing ports and markets in the province, Nguyen Cong Hoang, director of Ha Tinh's Aquaculture Division, told VnExpress on Thursday.

The move comes after the Health Ministry on Tuesday warned the public against eating deep-sea marine life caught within 13.5 nautical miles of the provinces of Ha Tinh, Quang Binh, Quang Tri and Thua Thien-Hue in the wake of the infamous toxic spill in April.


Illustrated by VnExpress/Viet Chung

The Vietnamese government announced on June 30 that the Vietnamese unit of Taiwanese conglomerate Formosa Plastics Group was responsible for discharging toxic chemicals from its steel plant into the ocean, killing marine life and poisoning fish in the four central provinces.

The steel plant took responsibility for the disaster in June and pledged to pay $500 million to clean up the pollution and compensate those affected.



You can find older posts regarding ASEAN politics and economics news at SBC blog, and older posts regarding health and healthcare at IIMS blog. I thank you.

Vietnam - Fish not entirely safe to eat in central Vietnam: health ministry

An evaluation carried out by the Ministry of Health has revealed that deep-water seafood sourced from along Vietnam’s central coastline is not yet safe for consumption, following the mass fish deaths that occurred in the region earlier this year.

Deputy Minister of Health Nguyen Thanh Long announced the test results of fish quality in central Vietnam during a press meeting on Tuesday morning, five months after the environmental disaster hit the region.

A large number of dead fish were washed ashore in the central provinces of Ha Tinh, Quang Binh, Quang Tri, and Thua Thien-Hue in early April.

In late June, it was concluded following a series of examinations by local and international scientists that wastewater of the Vietnamese steel subsidiary of Taiwan’s Formosa Plastics Group was responsible for the environmental disaster.

In late August, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment concluded that most of the central waters were safe for swimming and aquaculture activities, with some exceptions.

According to Deputy Minister Long, significant research had been conducted based on a total of 1,040 fish samples collected from the local environment.

Findings of the study indicated that all samples of pelagic fish, namely tuna, mackerel, pompano, herring, and others, did not contain any poisonous substances.

However, 132 specimens of aquatic animals living near the bottom of the sea, including shrimp, crab, squid, and rays among others, were infected with phenol, a harmful chemical.

Given the test results, the health official concluded that all fish of the upper layer of the ocean are safe to eat.

He recommended that only seafood caught from the lower level of the sea not be consumed.

During an interview with Tuoi Tre (Youth) newspaper on Tuesday, an official from the Ministry of Health said that inspections would continue until all fish are deemed completely safe.

Experts from the Vietnam Food Safety Agency, National Institute for Food Control, and National Institute of Nutrition will collect more fish samples for further assessment of their phenol content, the official elaborated.

He also guaranteed that fish caught 20 nautical miles offshore were safe for consumption.

Update on aquaculture activities

According to the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, seaways previously declared harmful are now good for fish farming, following the latest test results.

During the meeting, deputy environment minister Ha Cong Tuan issued some guidance on the operation of aquaculture activities for local residents.

Farmers should focus on raising their fish at the upper layer of the ocean in order to ensure safety and minimize losses, Tuan stated.

“Inspections will also be carried out at local fish farms and on fishing boats to ensure that all seafood is safe before being distributed and consumed,” he added.



You can find older posts regarding ASEAN politics and economics news at SBC blog, and older posts regarding health and healthcare at IIMS blog. I thank you.

Saturday, September 17, 2016

Vietnam - Don't eat fish caught off Vietnam's central coast: health authorities

Catches may still contain poisonous chemicals.

Vietnamese food safety authorities have warned against eating seafood caught off the coast of the four central provinces affected by the environmental disaster caused by the Vietnam unit of Taiwanese conglomerate Formosa Plastics Group.

The Vietnamese government announced on June 30 that the Taiwan-owned steel firm Formosa was responsible for discharging toxic chemicals into the ocean, killing marine life and poisoning fish in four central provinces.

Nearly three month after the announcement, Minister of the Environment Tran Hong Ha said last week that it’s now safe to swim in the affected provinces and that fish farming could resume in most areas.

However, the big question that remains unanswered is whether it is safe to eat fish caught within 20 nautical miles (37 kilometers) off the coast of the four provinces.

Thorough research and strict supervision by the Ministry of Health are needed to make sure it is safe to eat fish caught off the central coast, Nguyen Thanh Phong, the director of the ministry's Food Safety Department, has said.

He added that the Health Ministry, supported by a team of experts and scientists, is set to make its final conclusion by early September.

“We need time to make a full assessment which requires enough statistical samples and a larger sample size. We can’t rush this,” Phong said, adding that he hoped the results will confirm the government’s announcement last week that chemicals, including cyanide, have been diluted.

“As the Prime Minister has said, the number one concern is the people’s wellbeing. That’s why we have to wait for a more detailed report before we can answer whether it is now safe to eat the seafood,” Phong continued.

The senior food safety official strongly warned the public to refrain from eating fish in the affected areas until the pollution has been cleaned up.

Even though the government may have managed to mitigate the consequences by bringing down the concentration of harmful chemicals in the sea water to acceptable levels, that doesn’t mean it is already safe to eat fish, Phong said.

He explained that harmful chemicals in the sea water may have fallen, but residue can still be found in the seafood.

At a conference last week, Mai Trong Nhuan, who led a team of Vietnamese and foreign scientists to study the consequences of the toxic disaster, said that marine life, including sea water and sea-bed sediment, is generally within safety standards for aquaculture farming, fishing and tourism activities.

He also told the conference that the toxic chemicals the steel factory dumped into the sea, including cyanide, phenols and iron hydroxide, have shown signs of waning.

The marine ecosystem, coral reefs, sea grass and other marine resources which were seriously damaged in terms of scale and species has begun to recover.

However, since then the media has reported chemical residue still present in fish caught offshore.

The steel plant, owned by the Formosa Plastics Group, took responsibility for the disaster in June and pledged to pay $500 million to clean up the pollution and compensate those affected.

The mass fish deaths have ravaged local fisheries, disrupted people’s lives and hit tourism in the central provinces of Ha Tinh, Quang Binh, Quang Tri and Thua Thien – Hue.

The government said in a report in July that the disaster had harmed the livelihoods of more than 200,000 people, including 41,000 fishermen.

An estimated 115 tons of fish washed up ashore along more than 200 kilometers of the central coast in April, the report said.

Formosa Plastics’ $10.6 billion steel complex in Ha Tinh province includes a steel plant, a power plant and a deep sea port.




You can find older posts regarding ASEAN politics and economics news at SBC blog, and older posts regarding health and healthcare at IIMS blog. I thank you.

Saturday, August 27, 2016

Vietnam - Vietnam Says It's Now Safe to Swim at Most Central Beaches

A Vietnamese government minister says it's now safe to swim at most beaches in four central provinces where massive fish deaths occurred more than four months ago because of toxic chemicals released by a Taiwanese steel company.

The online newspaper VnExpress quoted Environment Minister Tran Hong Ha as telling a conference Monday that aquaculture is now also safe in most areas, but that research by the Ministry of Health is needed to determine whether it's safe to eat fish caught within 20 nautical miles (23 miles, 37 kilometers) off the coast of the four affected provinces.

Professor Mai Trong Nhuan, who headed a team of Vietnamese and foreign scientists commissioned by the government to study the impact of the disaster, told the conference that the chemicals, including cyanide and carbolic acids, are becoming more dilute, according to VnExpress.

Nhuan said the marine ecosystem, including coral reefs, sea grasses and other marine resources that were seriously damaged, has begun to recover.

The factory, owned by the Formosa Plastics Group, acknowledged in June that it was responsible for the pollution that killed large numbers of fish off the central Vietnamese coast, and pledged to pay $500 million to clean it up and compensate affected people.

The country's worst environmental disaster has devastated the fishing and tourism industries in the region.

The government said in a report to the National Assembly in July that the disaster harmed the livelihoods of more than 200,000 people, including 41,000 fishermen.

An estimated 115 tons of fish washed ashore along more than 200 kilometers (125 miles) of the central coast in April, the report said. The pollution sparked rare protests across the country.

Formosa Plastics's $10.6 billion steel complex in Ha Tinh province includes a steel plant, a power plant and a deep sea port, and is one of the largest foreign investments in Vietnam.



You can find older posts regarding ASEAN politics and economics news at SBC blog, and older posts regarding health and healthcare at IIMS blog. I thank you.

Vietnam - Inconsistency the only consistency in reports on fish quality in central Vietnam

A lack of consistency in seafood samples taken from central Vietnam seawater since mass fish deaths hit the region earlier this year has left many concerned about seafood safety there.

A report submitted by the National Institute for Food Control (NIFC) to the Ministry of Health shows that six out of nine seafood samples collected from the central coastline were discovered containing excessive amounts of phenol, cyannual, and cadmium, a heavy metal substance.

According to the NIFC, out of the nine fish samples retrieved on August 5 from the coastal area around Ha Tinh Province’s Ky Anh and Cam Xuyen Districts, one contained high cadmium levels, about 0.079 milligrams per one kilogram of fish, and six others were found with excessive phenol and cyannual.

Meanwhile, the Agency of Food Safety under the Ministry of Health told Tuoi Tre (Youth) newspaper on Tuesday that testing throughout August confirmed that only one out of every 18 samples contained high levels of cadmium.

Responding to the inconsistent results, a representative from the Agency of Food Safety stated that the new findings by the NIFC were only recently updated.

Similar inconsistencies have also been recorded on various testing done since the beginning of the mass fish deaths in April.

Accordingly, the Ministry of Health announced in late May that 97 out 140 fish, salt, and water samples taken from the impacted coast areas did not include excessive toxins.

In more recent reports, the ministry stated that over 430 seafood samples collected in April and May were discovered with high amounts of heavy metals including iron, lead, and chromium.

Seafood contamination in central Vietnam is believed to have started after massive numbers of dead fish washed ashore in Ha Tinh, Quang Binh, Quang Tri, and Thua Thien-Hue in April 2016.

By late June, local and international scientists had concluded that wastewater from the Vietnamese steel-making subsidiary of Taiwan’s Formosa Plastics Group was responsible for the environmental disaster.

The Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment asserted at a conference on Monday that most, but not all of the central waters, are now safe for swimming and fishing activities.

However, the overall edibility of seafood from the region remains unclear, with local fishermen concerned for their livelihoods.

The lack of consistent test results has left a hung jury on fish safety in the region and local authorities are uncertain of what to do with local seafood.

Nguyen Huu Hoai, chairman of the Quang Binh People’s Committee, said hundreds of metric tons of frozen fish have been put in storage with unclear plans for their fate.

Meanwhile, the Quang Tri administration has announced that it will dispose of 60 frozen seafood bought from local fishermen between late April and May due to low salability.



You can find older posts regarding ASEAN politics and economics news at SBC blog, and older posts regarding health and healthcare at IIMS blog. I thank you.

Saturday, July 16, 2016

Can Fish Oil Prevent Prostate Cancer?

Overview










1.     Highlights
2.     The omega-3 fatty acids found in fish oil offer a number of benefits.
3.     Omega-3s are considered an anti-inflammatory.

Research is mixed on whether fish oil can help prevent or treat cancer.
Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men. The disease occurs when the cells of a man’s prostate begin to multiply in an abnormal way.

In addition to traditional cancer treatments, some people are looking to alternative therapies for relief. Fish oil is purported to have many uses, including reducing your risk for prostate cancer. We’ll break down the benefits and risks of fish oil, and what the research says about its effect on cancer.

What are the benefits of fish oil?

Benefits
  • Omega-3s can reduce your risk for heart attack.
  • They may protect against damage from UV rays.
  • They may also improve symptoms of depression. 

As the name suggests, fish oil is taken from the tissues of oily fish. Fish oil contains a number of omega-3 fatty acids, which provide many health benefits.

For example, absorbing theses fatty acids through the skin can provide protection against damage from UV rays.

Omega-3s can help stabilize fatty deposits on the side of arteries, which can make them less likely to rupture. The fatty acids can also reduce the frequency and severity of cardiovascular problems, such as heart attacks.

Omega-3s may also:
  • improve symptoms of colitis
  • improve symptoms of cystic fibrosis
  • treat symptoms of lupus
  • lower triglyceride levels

People with depression may improve their condition by eating more fish or omega-3 foods. Fish oil has also been used to treat psychiatric disorders.

When it comes to cancer prevention, fish oil has mixed reviews. It’s thought that omega-3s may reduce your risk for breast cancer. However, it may increase your risk for other cancers, including prostate cancer.

What the research says

The jury is still out on whether fish oil is beneficial for prostate cancer prevention and treatment. In fact, some research suggests it could be a factor of increasing risk when it comes to the prostate.

A 2014 study found a link between consuming omega-3 fatty acids and a higher risk of prostate cancer, but the findings are still preliminary. More research is needed to determine the possible connection between prostate cancer and omega-3s.

Overall, doctors recommend adding fish oil and other omega-3 fatty acids to your diet because of its effects on heart health and other types of cancer. Omega-3s have anti-inflammatory properties and have been thought to ward off certain diseases.

Risks and warnings

Risks
  • Large amounts of fish oil may cause nausea.
  • Ingesting too much may also cause a loose stool.
  • Fish oil can interfere with certain medications.

As with any medication or supplement, fish oil isn’t for everyone. You shouldn’t add fish oil to your diet if you’re taking:

certain chemotherapy drugs, including ones that are platinum-based
glucocorticoids, a type of steroid hormones
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Fish oil may affect how these medications work and cause more side effects.

Most people can take fish oil without having any side effects, though side effects are possible. You may experience loose stools and nausea after ingesting large amounts of fish oil.

How to use fish oil

Although you may expect fish oil to be a liquid, it’s available in softgel form. You can generally find fish oil supplements at your local pharmacy or grocery store.

It’s important to remember that the omega-3s in the fish oil are what’s important. A standard 1,000-milligram dose of fish oil only contains about 300 milligrams of omega-3s. A 500-milligram dose of omega-3s is considered average. To meet the average dose, you may need to take more than one fish oil softgel.

If you’re interested in adding fish oil to your regimen, you should meet with your doctor. They can help guide you through the process and discuss any potential risks.

Other treatment options for prostate cancer

If you’ve been diagnosed with prostate cancer, there are many treatment options available to you. Your doctor and oncologist will recommend the best treatments for you. These treatments may include:
  • Radiation – If your cancer is low grade, your doctor may recommend radiation to limit the spread of the disease.
  • Watching and waiting – Your doctor may recommend a surveillance treatment if the cancer is slow-growing, such as prostate cancer. You and your doctor will monitor any progression through regular appointments and perhaps an occasional blood test.
  • Vaccine treatment – A vaccine called sipuleucel-T (Provenge) has been made to fight prostate cancer cells. This vaccine is unlike other vaccines, which help the body fight infections. Check with your doctor to see if this treatment is right for you.
  • Hormone therapy – Your doctor may recommend hormone therapy to keep tumors from getting bigger. This therapy works by reducing the number of male hormones in the body. These hormones are what may trigger the effects of prostate cancer.

What you can do now

Although fish oil is considered beneficial for your overall health, it isn’t clear what kind of effect it may have on your prostate. Consult with your doctor before adding fish oil to your regimen.

Be sure to mention any family cancer history. This information will help your doctor determine what’s best for your health profile.

If you decide to try fish oil, remember:
  • The omega-3 fatty acids are what provide the health benefits.
  • An average dose of omega-3s is 500 milligrams.
  • A typical dose of fish oil may not provide the recommended amount of omega-3s.

Traci Angel