Indonesia,
the largest member of ASEAN, urged on Tuesday all concerned parties to exercise
self-restraint and refrain from taking any measures that could escalate
tensions in Southeast Asia.
Without
making a direct reference to the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s (PCA) ruling
on the South China Sea (SCS), the government pointed to the importance of
maintaining the commitments shared by all sides to uphold peace and act in
accordance with the principles they agreed upon together.
“Indonesia
once again calls on all parties to exercise self-restraint and to refrain from
any action that could escalate tensions, as well as to protect the Southeast
Asian region particularly from any military activity that could pose a threat
to peace and stability and to respect international law, including UNCLOS
[United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea] 1982,” the Foreign Ministry
said in a statement after the court issued its ruling.
Indonesia
is not a claimant to the South China Sea. China recognizes Indonesia’s
territorial sovereignty over the Natuna Islands. However, the Natunas and their
surrounding waters are the part of Indonesia closest to the so-called
“nine-dash line”, a demarcation unilaterally declared by China as the basis of
its claim to most of the resource-rich SCS.
About
83,000 square meters of Indonesia’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the
Natunas is included within the area demarcated by the nine-dash line.
President
Joko “Jokowi” Widodo visited the Natuna Islands and vowed the government would
take all necessary measures to defend Indonesia’s sovereignty. The government
plans to strengthen its military presence on the islands, but Jokowi is also
committed to maintaining good relations with the world’s second-largest
economy.
“Indonesia
also calls on all parties to continue a shared commitment to upholding peace
and to demonstrate the friendship and cooperation that has been nurtured over
the years,” said the Foreign Ministry statement.
“Indonesia
encourages all claimant states to continue peaceful negotiations over their
overlapping claims of sovereignty in the South China Sea in accordance with
international law,” it said.
International
law expert Eka Sjarief said the government’s response to the award should be
appreciated, as the PCA ruling will greatly benefit the rule of international
law and the credibility of UNCLOS.
The
ruling comes just weeks before ASEAN is set to host a series of meetings with
its various partners – which includes everyone from China to the US — in
Vientiane, Laos.
“In terms
of substance, I think an agreement was already reached in the 2016 ASEAN
Ministerial Retreat that all parties shall fully respect all legal and
diplomatic processes,” said Eka, who heads the University of Padjadjaran’s
international law alumni association.
“If ASEAN
doesn’t end up issuing a statement, it should amount to nothing more than a
procedural thing.”
For
international relations expert Dafri Agussalim, not only did the ruling
disapprove of China’s activities on the global stage, it also spelled progress
for the dispute settlement process in one of the world’s most strategic
maritime trade routes.
Now that
there is a strong legal basis to pressure the East Asian giant, it is important
for the international community, especially ASEAN, to sit together in unity and
press China through diplomatic means, he said.
ASEAN’s
unity and diplomatic pressures will be the key to achieve peaceful settlements
for the SCS problems and Indonesia will be in a strategic position to lead the
efforts, the Gadjah Mada University lecturer argued.
“It might
take years, but diplomacy works the best in times like these. But ASEAN needs
to carry out talks with China covertly to avoid humiliating it, as it might
lead the country to be more aggressive in pursuing its interests in the
waters,” Dafri said.
Key decisions
1. There
is no legal basis for China to claim historic rights to resources within the
sea areas falling within the ‘nine-dash line’.
2. There
is no evidence that China has historically exercised exclusive control over the
waters.
3. None
of the Spratly Islands are capable of generating extended maritime zones.
4. China
has violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights in its exclusive economic zone.
5. China
has caused severe harm to the coral reef environment and violated its
obligation to preserve and protect fragile ecosystems.
6.
China’s recent large-scale land reclamation and construction of artificial
islands are incompatible with the obligations of a state during
dispute-resolution proceedings.
Anggi M.
Lubis and Tama Salim
No comments:
Post a Comment