The
monopoly on transport services at Vietnamese hospitals has come under fire
after an outsourced ambulance carrying a dying child was denied passage at a
central hospital in Hanoi earlier this month.
Footage
emerged online earlier this month showing a group of security guards at the
Vietnam National Hospital of Pediatrics (VNHP) in Hanoi preventing an ambulance
carrying a dying child from leaving the hospital, as the boy’s mother wailed in
anguish.
The boy
was suffering from multiple inborn heart malfunctions and had been returned
home from an unsuccessful surgery. He died aboard the ambulance before it had
been allowed to leave the hospital, according to the transport ministry-run
Giao Thong (Transportation) newspaper, which cited the ambulance’s driver Mr.
Nguyen Canh Toan.
In the
nearly nine-minute clip filmed by Toan, the group of hospital guards is heard
swearing and threatening to lock the vehicle’s wheels with a chain, despite the
patient’s family presenting the appropriate discharge papers.
It was
revealed later that the guards had blocked the ambulance because it was a
privately hired one, while patients at the hospital are encouraged to use the
monopolized ambulance at nearly triple the cost.
Although
the guards involved have been fired and the hospital has made a public apology,
the scandal has sparked a debate over the monopoly in providing transport
services at hospitals in Vietnam.
Tran Minh
Dien, Deputy Director at VNHP, admitted that the policy of allowing only one
brand of taxi to park and pick up passengers inside the hospital’s grounds had
been in place for three years to maintain order and prevent taxi drivers from
fighting for passengers.
In answer
to the ambulance scandal, Dien said the hospital was trying its best to improve
its services, adding that allowing all vehicles to enter and leave the hospital
would result in disorder.
The
incident has caused public outrage, with many sharing their own experiences and
denouncing the situation at hospitals around the country in terms of transport
services, ambulances and taxis alike.
D., a
father whose child was once admitted to VNHP for three months, recalled his
experience on the Facebook page of Vietnamese Health Minister Nguyen Thi Kim
Tien.
D. said
the ‘ambulance brokers’ at the hospital were experienced and would make contact
with families as soon as they got wind of the family’s intention to use the
service.
As
ambulances from other service providers were not allowed to pick up patients
inside the hospital, D. and many others had no choice but to use their
overpriced service.
“Patients
already have a mountain of hospital bills to pay,” D. wrote, “We have to cut
down on every penny of our spendings even for food, let alone [VND] millions”.
Meanwhile,
one taxi driver in Hanoi said that the taxi service is also monopolized at the
hospital, with passengers having to walk outside the hospital to hail any taxi
company other than the one exclusive to the hospital.
“If a
taxi from any other company was to pick up passengers inside after dropping
their previous passengers off, the passengers would be made to step off and
walk all the way to the front before getting on again,” the driver said.
The
country’s Ministry of Health said it would hold a meeting with hospitals this
week to rectify the provision of non-medical services at hospitals, attributing
the recent scandals to the outsourcing of such services.
No comments:
Post a Comment